Hagen v. Beth
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, granting a preliminary injunction. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in Schwarz v. Superior Court, 111 Cal. 106.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction.
The nature of the present action and the terms of the order appealed from will be found sufficiently stated in Schwarz v. Superior Court, 111 Cal. 106, where the same order was under consideration upon certiorari to review the action of the court below in attempting to punish these appellants for contempt for an al*331leged violation of its terms. It was there held that the order, in so far as it directed and required the removal of the obnoxious signs, was mandatory in character.
To the extent that the injunction is mandatory it was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Gardner v. StroeverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by22 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Shoemaker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Evans v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Gray v. Council of Newark & the Newark Water & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
- People ex rel. Herrera v. StenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.