Legal Opinion
Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Cannon & Dunphy, S.C.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 28, 2014No. Case Nos. 13-C-877, 13-C-931Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge.
These cases relate to a state court lawsuit between rival personal injury firms. In that case, the principals of Habush, Habush & Rottier, S.C. alleged that Cannon & Dunphy, S.C. (and its principals) violated their statutory right to privacy by bidding on the electronic keywords “ha-bush” and “rottier” on internet search engines, thus assuring that links to Cannon & Dunphy’s website would appear as a “sponsored link” when users perform searches using the words Habush and/or Rottier. Cannon & Dunphy tendered the defense of this lawsuit to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Adkins v. VIM Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Medical Assur. Co., Inc. v. HellmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United National Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. R&d Latex Corporation, a Georgia Corporation Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., a California Corporation, and Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Plaintiff-Counter v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and William C. Morison-Knox and Michael D. ProughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.