Legal Opinion

Morrison & Quinn, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by the claimant, Morrison & Quinn, Inc., from a judgment of the Court of Claims in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 3d day of November, 1920, dismissing the claim upon the merits.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

Qn the 16th day of October, 1916, the appellant and the State of New York entered into a contract for the construction by claimant of a lock in the Erie canal about fifty feet from the junction of the. Erie and Barge canals near the village of Mohawk, N. Y. The purpose of this lock was to permit boats to pass into the Barge canal from the Erie canal, and from the latter into the Barge canal. At this point the level of the Barge canal is some nine feet lower than that of the Erie canal.

Appellant began work under this contract in December, 1916, and was prosecuting its work when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dufel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Leahy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Edlux Construction Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Boland v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Waterman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  4. Allen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Moltion v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API