Legal Opinion

Waterman v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1963No. Claim No. 40040; 40041; 40042; 40043PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The claimants appeal from an order of the Court of Claims dismissing their claims on the ground (1) that the claims were not timely filed and (2) that the claims were insufficient in law to state a cause of action.

On September 28 and 29, 1959, a trial had been held in the Court of Claims before Judge Heller of the three Waterman claims against the State of New York and the New York State Thruway Authority. The claims grew out of an automobile accident which had occurred on June 29, 1957, on the New York State Thruway. On October 27, 1960, Judge Heller rendered a judgment in favor of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Company v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Edlux Construction Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Edlux Construction Corporation v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Winston v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Dufel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tango v. TulevechNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re the Arbitration between the Board of Education & Wager Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Zook Bros. Construction Company v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hudleasco, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1977
  5. Mahoney v. Temporary Commission of InvestigationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API