Dubbin v. Capital National Bank of Miami
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 250 So.2d 663, reading as follows:
“PER CURIAM.
“Affirmed.”
This decision upheld the trial judges finding in favor of the respondent-plaintiff in a foreclosure action.
We are unable to ascertain from the case records before us whether or not we have jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A., when viewed in relation to the allegations of the petition for writ of certiorari that the doctrine of legal estoppel by warranty deed, as enunciated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund v. LobeanSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Rosenthal v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Home Development Co. of St. Petersburg v. BursaniSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Falkner v. BlantonSupreme Court of Florida · 1974