Legal Opinion
Home Development Co. of St. Petersburg v. Bursani
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 2, 1964No. 33242PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
168 So.2d 131 (1964)
HOME DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC., and Roy J. Deeb and Marilyn K. Deeb, his wife, Petitioners,
v.
Rudolph BURSANI and Lillian Bursani, Individually and as husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 33242.
Supreme Court of Florida.
October 2, 1964.
Rehearing Denied November 10, 1964.
Kiernan & Reams, St. Petersburg, for petitioners.
Nelson, Beckett & Nelson, St. Petersburg, for respondents.
2Per curiam
This cause is before the court on "direct conflict" certiorari to review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal affirming a decree of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Minnesota v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Rosenthal v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
4Cited by13 opinions
- Home Dev. Co. of St. Petersburg v. BursaniSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Fl. for Level Play v. Fl. Against GamblingSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Florida Greyhound Owners & Breeders Ass'n v. West Flagler Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.