Legal Opinion

Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co. v. Richmond Cedar Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Decided February 6, 1908No. 28,245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judge.

This cause is now on final hearing on bill to restrain infringement of claim 1 of patent No. 535,405, granted to John Schroeder, March 12, 1895, for “new and useful improvements in means for operating washing machines.” The claim reads as follows, viz.:

“1. An operating shaft having a rotary reciprocating motion, a cylinder placed upon the shaft and having a sliding movement thereon, and through which cylinder motion is alone communicated to the shaft, and a double row of teeth or cogs upon the cylinder extending at an angle to the shaft, combined with a driving shaft…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brammer v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co. v. Simpson Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1904
  3. Consolidated Fastener Co. v. HaysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  4. Schroeder v. BrammerU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1900
  5. Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co. v. Heffron-Tanner Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wayne Mfg. Co. v. Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
  3. Holt Mfg. Co. v. Best Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API