Legal Opinion

Batchelor v. Brye

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1982No. Civ. 3078PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the trial court's finding that a judgment had been satisfied and we affirm.

The plaintiff, Archie Batchelor, in his capacity as administrator of his son's estate, sued defendants, Charles Dienhelt and Hattie May Brye, alleging that the defendants' negligence resulted in the death of the plaintiff's son. Additionally, the plaintiff sued his uninsured motorist carrier, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company (State Farm). Defendant Dienhelt was also insured by State Farm. Defendant Brye was an uninsured motorist.

In a separate count, the plaintiff as indicated, sought to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Higgins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. International Sales-Rentals Leasing Co. v. NearhoofSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Williams v. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. ClemCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Star Freight, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Bartley v. Guillot, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. COOPER BY AND THROUGH COOPER v. AplinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Weatherly v. FlournoyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API