Stoutenburgh v. Svecenski
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by John H. Stoutenburgh against Louis Svecenski. From two orders of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, plaintiff appeals.
1Per curiam
A motion was made by the defendant" in this case for judgment upon the pleadings. This motion was granted, and an order entered thereon. Subsequently the plaintiff made a motion for a reargument of the first motion, which was denied, and he appeals from both orders.
[1] An appeal will not lie from an order denying a motion for a reargument. Percy v. Sire, 119 N. Y. Supp. 225; Romes v. Boettger, 120 N. Y. Supp. 754; Tucker v. Dudley, 104 App. Div. 191, 93 N. Y. Supp. 355.
[2] We need not now determine whether or not the Municipal Court can entertain a motion for judgment on the pleadings. See…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spiegelman v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Metropolitan El. Ry. Co. v. JohnstonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Maune v. Unity PressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Citron v. BayleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Martin v. LefkowitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.