Legal Opinion

Stallman v. Youngquist

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 1984No. 83-1987PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

Plaintiff, Lindsay Stallman, by her father and next friend, Mark Stallman, appeals an order of the trial court dismissing count II of her second amended complaint. She raises the following issues for review: (1) whether the trial court’s dismissal of count II of her complaint was proper and (2) whether her cause of action in negligence (count II) should be barred by application of the parent-child tort immunity rule.

We reverse and remand.

On April 27, 1983, plaintiff filed her second amended complaint alleging that she is a minor and was born on January 25, 1982. On October 7, 1981, at 4:46…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kobylanski v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Schenk v. SchenkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Larson v. BuschkampAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Glaskox by and Through Denton v. GlaskoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stallman v. YoungquistIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Martin v. Federal Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Zawaski v. FraineyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API