Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Sweeney
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 17, 1998No. Nos. 97-1383, 97-1417PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants Rhetta and John Sweeney are appealing a final’ judgment by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts which granted appellee Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) possession of certain properties in Hamilton, Massachusetts now occupied by the Swee-neys. Earlier litigation established that the Sweeneys had defaulted on the loans which were secured by the property occupied by the Sweeneys. See Sweeney v. Resolution Trust Corp., 16 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.1994).1 We affirm.
On appeal the Sweeneys raise three claims. None has merit. The Sweeneys argue that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Jerome Fleet CowdenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Larry J. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of Comfed Savings Bank, F.A. v. Rhetta B. Sweeney and John Sweeney, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of Comfed Savings Bank, F.A. v. Rhetta B. Sweeney, John Sweeney and John Does I-VCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998