Calloway v. Doty

As these two cases were#briefed and argued together in this court, and the facts are substantially the same in each case, there seems to be no valid reason why they may not be disposed of in one opinion.

It appears that Edith Lair commenced an action in the district court for Lancaster county against Arthur J. Calloway upon a promissory note for $3,000, which, by its terms, was to bear interest at 10 per cent, per annum from date until paid. Pending the action the plaintiff married Montreville Doty, and thereafter' the proceedings were conducted in the name of Edith Doty. On December G, 1917,…