Legal Opinion
Smith v. Equitable
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 8, 1998No. CIV.A. 98-1264PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant, The Equitable’s (“Equitable” or “Defendant”), Motion to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiffs claims and to Dismiss Plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff, C. Leon Smith’s (“Smith” or “Plaintiff’), complaint alleges claims for employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et. seq. (Title VII), 42 *567U.S.C. § 1981, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (the “PHRA”) as well as Pennsylvania state law claims for defamation, promissory estoppel, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sheila Warnock SEUS, Appellant, v. JOHN NUVEEN & CO., INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Seville Industrial Machinery Corp. v. Southmost Machinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Moser v. DeSettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Thomas James Associates, Inc. Barbara S. Miller Michelle K. Reichert Dave Kleber Michael G. Gomez and James A. Villa v. Harry JamesonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- C. Leon Smith v. The EquitableCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Bolinger v. Virgin Islands Telephone Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
- Daniel v. Treasure Bay Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Smith v. EquitableCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000