Legal Opinion

Chiriaco v. Jacks

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 2, 1982No. Civ. 3008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in an automobile accident case.

Appellant/plaintiff has not provided the court with a statement of facts, and the record on appeal does not contain a copy of the transcript of the proceedings at trial. From the pleadings filed in this case we can determine that on November 13,1979 plaintiff, Charles F. Chiriaco, filed a complaint pro se against defendant Marilyn Jacks Davis and against State Farm Insurance Company, as Davis’s insurer, alleging that Davis had negligently driven her ear into plaintiff’s automobile.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Computer Servicenters, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Adams v. AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Coburn v. American Liberty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Clevenger v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Rhea v. RheaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bruck v. Jim Walter Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Mitchell Bros. Contractors, Inc. v. BensonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Neal v. Redstone Federal Credit UnionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Bruck v. Jim Walter Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API