Clark v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Justice.
Samuel Thomas Clark was convicted of a violation of KRS 435.105 for engaging *655in indecent practices with a child under fifteen years of age, and received a sentence of ten years. A motion to strike the hill of exceptions was sustained because it was not filed in this Court within the time allowed. This ruling eliminated all questions urged in appellant’s brief relative to the competency of certain testimony and makes it unnecessary to review the evidence. The remaining question is whether the indictment is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.
It is urged that KRS…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Maggard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Pierce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Koch v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Lair v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Faulkner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961