Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 28, 1929No. 637PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCushman, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Section 2128 et seq. of the Revised Statutes made provision for the licensing of Indian Traders. These statutes have been changed by later laws in certain particulars (19 Stat. 200, § 5 [25 USCA § 261]; 31 Stat. 1066; 32 Stat. 1009, § 10; Compiled Statutes, § 4127 et seq., 25 USCA § 261 et seq.), yet no contention is made that plaintiff is not entitled to such relief as that prayed to prevent trading without the permission of' the Commissioner of Indian Affairs upon the Quillehute Indian Reservation. Light v. United States, 220 U. S. 523, 31 S. Ct. 485, 55…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API