Legal Opinion

Boles v. Hegler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1950No. 749PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeviN, I.

The only error assigned by defendants ivas the denial of their motion for judgment of nonsuit. It was not controverted that there was evidence of negligence on the part of the defendants, but it was contended the evidence conclusively established the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, entitling defendants to the allowance of their motion on this ground.

The rule is well settled that in order to sustain a nonsuit on this ground the evidence tending to show contributory negligence must be so clear that no other conclusion reasonably can be drawn therefrom. Maddox v. Brown, ante,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Cole v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Wilson v. WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Cox v. Hennis Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API