Pemberton v. Republic Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge.
Defendants bring a motion (Doe. No. 53) to quash a subpoena issued by Plaintiffs to Pel-opidas, LLC, a non-party public relations company hired by Defendants’ attorney, or in the alternative, to grant a protective order against disclosure of the materials in question. Defendants argue that all the materials requested by Plaintiffs are protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that the attorney-client privilege does not extend to a public relations consultant on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Kenneth Lee Baker Steven Robert Baker, Melissa Thomas v. General Motors Corporation, in Re: General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Lake Lotawana Community Improvement DistrictUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2016
- Breuder v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 502, DuPage County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Cave v. ThurstonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022
- Jackson v. Senior Care Solutions, IncDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021