Legal Opinion
State of Ohio v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1985No. 84-3667PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Chief Judge.
Ohio seeks review of final action of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act as amended (the Act). 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. The particular provisions of the Act in controversy are portions of Part D of Subchapter I, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7501-7508, and section 107(d) and (e), 42 U.S.C. § 7407(d) and (e), all of which were added to the Act by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub.L. 95-95.
The question for decision is whether EPA may refuse a state’s request to redesignate a county from “nonattainment” to “attainment” where actual…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alabama Power Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Bishop v. FurtadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Western Oil And Gas Association v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- The Western & Southern Life Insurance Company v. George SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Oakland County Board of Commissioners v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Norwich Eaton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
- Covey v. Methodist Hospital of Dyersburg, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.