Legal Opinion

Biedenharn Candy Co. v. Moore

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1939No. 33519PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This action is on the implied warranty of a bottler of beverage that the beverage bottled and distributed by him is wholesome and fit for human consumption, which this Court holds inures to the ultimate consumer. Kroger Grocery Company v. Lewelling et al., 165 Miss. 71, 145 So. 726, and the numerous cases there cited.

The appellant says that the court below erred in:

1. Refusing its request for a directed verdict in its favor.

2. Refusing to exclude the appellee’s evidence of pain and suffering.

3. Refusing its request for an instruction directing the jury to award the appellee only nominal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery Co. v. LewellingMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Doherty v. Mississippi Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bufkin v. GrishamMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Stove Manufacturing Company v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Keyes v. Guy Bailey Homes, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Greene v. FlewellingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. City of Hattiesburg v. HillmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lombardi v. California Packing Sales CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API