Legal Opinion

United States v. Conkey

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 22, 1916No. 1545PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7668 (T. D. 34609).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case is marine-glue pitch, which was classified by the collector of customs at Boston as a nonenu-merated manufactured article, dutiable at 20 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 480 of the tariff act of 1909, Avhich,- in so far as pertinent to the issue, reads as follows:

480. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of * * * all articles manufactured in whole or in part, not provided for in this section, a duty of 20 per centum ad valorem.

The importers protested that the goods were entitled to free entry under that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. DominiciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  3. United States v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. American Bitumuls Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  3. American Pistachio Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  4. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Mexican Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API