Legal Opinion

American Pistachio Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 13, 1949No. C. D. 1198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

This protest is directed against the action of the collector of customs in refusing to allow drawback under the provisions of section 313 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1313 (c)) on the exportation of certain molasses imported from Syria which, it was claimed, did not conform to the specifications of the importer’s order.

The statutory provisions relied upon read as follows:

SEC. 313. DRAWBACK AND REFUNDS.

* * * * * . * *(c) Merchandise Not Conforming to Sample or Specifications. — Upon the exportation of merchandise not conforming to sample or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. ConkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Johnson Motors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API