Legal Opinion

Wiese v. Becton-Dickinson Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1992No. 91-587PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Kim M. Wiese appeals the Workers’ Compensation Court’s dismissal of her petition requesting compensation for the injuries which she claims she received arising out of and in the course of her employment with Becton-Dickinson Co. (B-D).

Wiese’s two assignments of error combine to claim that the compensation court erred in determining that she failed to sustain her burden of proof on causation of the injury to her left arm and shoulder. Because we find that there was plain error committed by the Workers’ Compensation Court in regard to its finding concerning the injuries to Wiese’s arm and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Schlup v. Auburn Needleworks, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Phelps v. PhelpsNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Mata v. Western Valley PackingNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Phipps v. Milton G. Waldbaum & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Hometown Communications, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. McGowan v. Lockwood Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bernhardt v. County of Scotts BluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Haney v. Aaron Ferer & Sons, Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Koterzina v. Copple Chevrolet, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API