Rodriguez v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOUNG, Justice.
Sammy and Mary Rodriguez appeal from a judgment dismissing with prejudice their Consumer Credit Code and Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims against Jim Walter Homes, Inc. Among their points of error is one which contends that the judgment should be reversed because a subsequent appellate review of the defendant’s plea of privilege deprived the trial court of jurisdiction. We agree and reverse.
On December 1,1978, Mr. and Mrs. Rodriguez and several other plaintiffs filed petitions in Nueces County alleging violations of the Consumer Credit Code, Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Marmon v. Mustang Aviation, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
- Ballard v. CarmichaelTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Allen v. WoodwardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Allen v. WoodwardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. PoundsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roland v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Keeshon Roland and Teanna Roland v. Daimler Chrysler Corporation, and/or Daimler Chrysler Motors Corporation And Heart of Texas Dodge, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Keeshon Roland and Teanna Roland v. Daimler Chrysler Corporation, and/or Daimler Chrysler Motors Corporation And Heart of Texas Dodge, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000