Legal Opinion

Harwood v. . the People

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the Supreme- Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.

The indictment charged the plaintiff in error with keeping a "bawdy-house. It was proven that he kept a house in the city of Syracuse, and to make out the offence it was necessary to .establish the character or kind of house so kept by him. A bawdy-house is defined to be a house of ill-fame, kept for the resort and unlawful commerce of lewd people of both sexes. (1 Bowvier L. Dict., 163.) It was essential therefore for the prosecution to establish the character of the house, and, to show that, the characters of the persons frequenting it or resorting to it. The questions put to the witnesses,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bach v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People v. . PasqualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. State v. MalenaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  5. Claiborne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API