Great American Assurance Co. v. Liberty Surplus Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL AND TO STRIKE FROM THE RECORD PRIVILEGED INFORMATION AND VACATING HEARING
INTRODUCTION
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Defendant Liberty Surplus Insurance brings this motion to strike from the record attorney-client privileged and work-product protected communication allegedly inadvertently sent to an agent for Great American Assurance Company. Liberty also argues that Great American’s counsel should be disqualified for not returning and for using the communication. In reply, Great American maintains that this motion was brought for an improper purpose…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Lawrence S. Bittaker v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison of San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Transamerica Computer Company, Inc., and v. International Business MacHines Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Vernon JoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- United States v. F. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Continental Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- U.S. Inspection Services, Inc. v. NL Engineered Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Schaeffer v. Gregory Village Partners, L.P.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.