Legal Opinion

Hobson v. Raychem Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1999No. A081830PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAMBDEN, J.

In this case Tracy Hobson (appellant) claims that her employer Raychem Corporation (Raychem) unlawfully discriminated against her because she suffered from a particular disease specified in both her administrative charge and in her complaint. Faced with summary judgment, appellant claimed that her disease was related to other, previously unmentioned, mental disabilities which she claimed Raychem had failed to accommodate. We therefore consider whether holistic theory extends to the law and procedure pertaining to claims of discrimination based upon disability. We conclude…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Janken v. GM Hughes ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cynthia Thompson v. Holy Family Hospital, a Division of Dominican Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lewis v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Bozzi v. NORDSTROM, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Diaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
  5. Prue v. Brady Company/San Diego, Inc. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API