Legal Opinion

Arizona Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc. v. Shalala

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided November 13, 1998No. Civ.97-1305 PHX ROS (VAM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MATHIS, United States Magistrate Judge.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, eight health care institutions, provide rehabilitation care and furnish services under Medicare. Medicare traditionally allowed providers reimbursement for the reasonable cost of furnishing services to Medicare recipients. Under provisions first enacted in 1972, health care providers like Plaintiffs were permitted reimbursement for the lower of their costs or charges (“LCC”). This provision did not specify the time period used for determining the LCC, but legislative reports stated that the LCC principle should not be used to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  2. Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  3. Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
  4. Desert Survivors v. US Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API