Legal Opinion
Price Development Co. v. Redevelopment Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1988No. Nos. 87-6037, 87-6232PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Price Development Company brought suit for reimbursement of a $200,000 option deposit it paid to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chino, California as part of an exclusive negotiating agreement. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Agency, and Price appeals. The Agency cross-appeals from the district court’s order denying its motion for an award of attorney fees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
I
FACTS
In 1984, the Agency engaged in efforts to develop a 41-acre parcel of land in Chino, California into a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edward Ashton v. Kenneth CoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. First National Bank of CircleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Price Development Company v. Redevelopment Agency Of The City Of ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988