Concord Construction Co. v. Plante
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Guthrie B. Plante, as trustee, etc., and another, from portions, and by Wiliam H. Bolton and others, from the whole of a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff and certain of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 24th day of May, 1909, upon the1 decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
Action by a sub-contractor to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon a fund due the general contractor from the city of Hew York. The general contractor was the firm of H. M. Weed & Co., which was a partnership composed óf H. If. Weed and one Barrett. On the 2d of October, 190T, Weed’exeeuted, in the name of the firm, four assignments, the aggregate amount of which covered substantially the entire fund in question. . The plaintiff filed its notice of lien on October third, and similar notices were filed by the other respondents on the same day, or shortly thereafter. The firm was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greenwald v. . WalesNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Wood v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Crane Co. v. Pneumatic Signal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Crane Company v. . SmytheNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Gross v. DalyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schultz v. Teichman Engineering & Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913