Legal Opinion
In Re Burbank Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 8, 1943No. 39671PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
Should a public utility be paid in full for service rendered prior to filing a petition, as a condition to rendering further service, where a debtor has filed a petition under the provisions of Chap. XI of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 701 et seq., and later is adjudicated a bankrupt?
The Burbank Corporation, a corporation hereinafter called the debtor, filed and had approved its petition under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, Sec. 322, on November 19, 1941. Counsel advise they have been unable to find an authority in point in the higher courts. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In Re Wil-Low CafeteriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Urban Properties Corporation v. BensonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- In Re Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1941
- In Re Standard Commercial Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- In re Warner Coal Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1949