Hartford Insurance Group v. Statewide Appliances, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Zenoff, C. J.:
The appellate question concerns the appropriate period of limitations in an action for damages that arose under the following circumstances. Hartford, as subrogee of the Wiedenbecks, alleged in two counts that the defendants, Statewide Appliances, Inc., and Joseph Lee Burchett, breached express and implied warranties that a water heater had been converted for the use of propane gas. The prayer for relief requested money damages.
The Wiedenbecks purchased a water heater from Statewide and Burchett about March 24, 1966. They told the sellers that the water…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Andrianos v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- Howe v. Pioneer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Italiani v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Meyer v. BenelliSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Siragusa v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Stalk v. MushkinNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WhartonNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Mason v. SchaubCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.