Legal Opinion
Castrillon v. ERM-Northeast, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 29, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200, 240, and 241, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 11, 1996, as, in effect, granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to dismiss the plaintiffs’ causes of action pursuant to Labor Law §§ 240 and 241.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Since the accident occurred in New Jersey, Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 are inapplicable (see, Padula v Lilarn Props.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Huston v. Hayden Building Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Grivas v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marchevka v. DeBartola Capital PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mazzella v. Socony Mobil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005