Legal Opinion
Marchevka v. DeBartola Capital Partnership
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 12, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated August 26, 2002, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
Although the point is uncontested, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the law of the State of New Jersey should apply to the plaintiff’s causes of action since the site of the injury was located in New Jersey (see…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Majestic Realty Associates, Inc. v. Toti Contracting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Muhammad v. New Jersey TransitSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Bahrle v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Mitchell v. Route 21 AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mazzella v. Socony Mobil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005