Legal Opinion

Israel v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to County Court of Larimer County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff in error in the court bes>w for the purpose of establishing her right to the estate of John Arthur, deceased, as sole surviving heir at law. Plaintiff was married to the said Arthur in 1859; there was no issue from the marriage, and, unless divorced, plaintiff was his wife at the date of his decease, and entitled, under the statute, there being no will, to inherit his entire estate.

Defendants in the court below were deceased’s brother, who was also administrator of the estate, and certain nephews and nieces, who were interested therein as heirs, provided…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Pryor v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. McDaniel v. CorrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Nelson v. RountreeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Shrader v. ShraderSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Kavanagh v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  4. D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Goddard v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API