State v. Allen
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.
Defendant was convicted of an attempt to commit rape and has appealed.
Appellant asserts the trial court erred, in permitting the state to amend the information after the state rested. The information was *375drawn pursuant to the provisions of G. S. 1935, 21-424, and charged appellant with the commission of the offense of forcible rape. At the conclusion of the state’s evidence in chief, counsel for appellant moved for a directed verdict on the ground the evidence showed the offense of rape had not been committed. The state conceded the evidence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BisagnoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- State v. StitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- State v. JenksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- State v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- State v. LangstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Battle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- State v. TurnbowNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. BabyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Commonwealth v. GosselinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.