Legal Opinion

West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 22, 1997No. 92 Civ. 0938(RO)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Ronald West 1 was injured in 1991 by an exploding tire when he mounted a 16” tire manufactured by defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”) on a 16.5” wheel manufactured by defendant The Budd Company (“Budd”). Plaintiffs seek from each defendant $2,000,000 in compensatory damages and $5,000,000 in punitive dam ages. Defendants bring a motion in limine to strike plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages which I will treat as a motion for summáry judgment pursuant to Rule 12(b). 2

West was the owner of a body shop which he operated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Sidney Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Caldwell v. . New Jersey Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Gostkowski v. Roman Catholic Church of Sacred Hearts of Jesus & MaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greenbaum v. Svenska Handelsbanken, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Time Warner Cable of New York City v. BarnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. Deere v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
  4. Bausenwein v. Snap-On IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
  5. Giannotti v. Mercedes Benz U.S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API