Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1907No. 390PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor, from city court of Americus— Judge Crisp. February 15, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

In the city court of Americus the defendant was convicted of the offense of shooting on a public highway. His motion for a new trial was overruled, and he excepts to that'judgment. The motion is upon the statutory grounds and also upon the extraordinary ground of newly-discovered evidence. Tfre *842plaintiff in error contends that it is necessary for the State to prove all of the material allegations before the jury would be authorized to convict, and insists that the State failed in this case to establish his guilt, because, under the Penal Code, §508, guilt is not established by proving alone…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conyers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  2. Elkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  4. Rumph v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Isom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Seidenbach's v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API