Legal Opinion
United States v. Fell
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided May 25, 2005No. 201CR1201PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER: VOIR DIRE
SESSIONS, Chief Judge.
As the Court writes this opinion, this capital case is in the midst of the lengthy voir dire process. The Court has established a two-part procedure for voir dire. First, each potential juror fills out an extensive questionnaire, which, in addition to standard voir dire questions, includes questions about personal history, knowledge of the case, and opinions regarding the death penalty. Second, each juror is questioned individually, first by the Court, then by attorneys for both the Government and the Defendant Donald Fell. The Court’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. FellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. PrinceArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. GarciaArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.