Legal Opinion

Horne v. Neill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1944No. 30201PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

In onr view the case turns upon the errors assigned in the seventh ground of the motion for new trial. Some of the assignments of error in the other grounds overlap’ the assignment in this ground. In this ground it is contended that the defendant’s first amendment to her answer set up an affirmative defense. It is our opinion that this amendment, which is set out in the foregoing statement of facts, amounted to an affirmative plea of contributory negligence, and became an issue in the case, concerning which the trial judge was required to charge the jury the applicable law as the law of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Savannah Electric Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Lamon v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Samples v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Brown v. Rome Machine & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Henley v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Hawkins v. Benton Rapid Express Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Mendenhall v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API