Legal Opinion
Mendenhall v. Nalley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 3, 1950No. 32876PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The evidence was in sharp conflict on all material points, and, while there is sufficient evidence to have authorized a verdict for the defendants, the jury resolved the issues of fact in favor of the plaintiff, and this court is without jurisdiction to set aside, on the general grounds, a verdict supported by some evidence.
The testimony of the plaintiff, Nalley, the only witness in his behalf, was not so self-contradictory, vague or equivocal as to require the reversal of a verdict in his favor.
Special ground 4 assigns error because the court failed to charge “that the contract would not be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Atlantic Coast-Line Railroad v. Henderson Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Horne v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Berry v. RoyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Community Loan & Investment Corp. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mullis v. ChaikaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Norair Engineering Corp. v. Porter Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Lewis v. DugganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Hope Electric, Inc. v. Gemini Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Carroll v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.