Legal Opinion

Standard Rice Co. v. Scofieild

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided May 20, 1939No. 40PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, District Judge.

In this case, plaintiff, a processor of rice, paid the Collector the processing taxes claimed to be due with tax payment war*855rants provided for by Section 8 of the amended Agricultural Adjustment Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 608. A small amount of the tax was paid in cash but to what extent it constituted payment upon rice which was afterwards exported is not disclosed by the evidence.

Plaintiff, after these payments to the Collector, exported a part of the rice covered by these processing taxes. It now brings suit against the Collector to recover the amount of tax claimed to have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Sage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Lowe Bros. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. El Campo Rice Milling Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API