Legal Opinion

El Campo Rice Milling Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1941No. 9708Published

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

El Campo Rice Milling Company, under marketing agreements made with the Secretary of Agriculture by virtue of Section 8 (2) of the original Agricultural Adjustment Act, 48 Stats. 31, 7 U.S.C.A. § 608(2), bought rough rice from producers at prices above the market and had on hand on March 31, 1935, over 8,000,000 pounds unprocessed. By the amendment of'March 18, 1935, Sect. 9(b) (3), 49 Stats. 45, 7 U.S.C.A. § 609 (b) (3) , a tax of one cent a pound was levied for processing, beginning April 1, 1935. Because rice on hand produced in 1933 and 1934 had been purchased at an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. FontenotSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Wilson & Co., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Standard Rice Co. v. ScofieildDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API