Hill v. Woodberry
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court, of thé United States, Eastern District of Arkansas.. Action by Hill, Fontaine & Co. against Woodberry & Hamilton, in which an attachment was sued out. John M. Denman, as assignee of defendants, interpleaded. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the interpleader.
1Opinion of the Court
Caldwell, Circuit Judge.
On the 12th day of March, 1891, Wood-berry & Hamilton, partners in the mercantile business at Prescott, Ark., executed a deed of assignment to Denman, as assignee, for the benefit of their creditors, without preferences, of their stock of merchandise, notes, and accounts, “and also all other property, of every name, nature, and description, to them belonging.” On the same day, but after the execution and delivery of the deed of assignment, the plaintiffs in error commenced an action in which they sued out a writ of attachment against Wood-berry & Hamilton for the sum…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Tyng v. GrinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Jaffray v. McGeheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Estes v. GunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Jett v. ShinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Omaha v. L'HerissonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Wile v. Farmers' State Bank of Charter OakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Eli Mining & Land Co. v. CarletonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- King v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Syracuse Tp. v. RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.