Legal Opinion
King v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 19, 1901No. 700PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
This was an action at law, in the form of replevin, to récover 190 bonds of the California & Nevada Railroad, of the alleged value of $50,000. A jury trial was expressly waived by the parties, and the cause was tried by the circuit court without a jury, and upon such trial the court found;
“(2) The plaintiff on the 26th day of September, 1900, was, ever since has been, and still is the owner and entitled to possession of the property described in the complaint; and said property was at all of said dates and times of the value of forty-seven thousand five hundred…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ryan v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Miller v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Pyle v. EastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Larimer v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- American Sales Book Co. v. BullivantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.