Legal Opinion
Saboe v. State of Or.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 8, 1993No. Civ. 92-1025-HOPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs allege a single cause of action under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, (the “Clean Water Act” or “CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and seven pendent state claims.
The state defendants filed “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12 Motions” (# 16), which is comprised of 17 separate rule 12 motions. 1 Motion # 1 is a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ federal claim under the CWA. The other 16 motions relate to the pendent state claims. Plaintiffs seek a mandatory preliminary injunction (# 18) requiring defendants to perform certain actions.
After oral…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment v. Contract Plating Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
- Hudson River Fishermen's Ass'n v. County of WestchesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Connecticut Coastal Fishermen's Ass'n v. Remington Arms Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Universal Tool & Stamping Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- STANFORD RANCH, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Kara Holding Corp. v. Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Sierra Club v. Colorado Refining Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Save Our Bays & Beaches v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994
- Arkansas Wildlife Federation v. ICI Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.