Legal Opinion

Duckett v. Payne

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 20, 1983No. 21905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Respondent initiated this action through his Guardian ad Litem to set aside a deed conveying property from himself to appellant. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the grantor was mentally incompetent at the time he executed the deed. Consequently, the court set aside the deed. We affirm.

Carse Duckett, an elderly widower in his eighties, has six emancipated children including Clarence Duckett, his Guardian ad Litem in this appeal, and appellant. He can neither read nor write, other than to sign his name. He purchased the six acre tract of land in question in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. DoolittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. McCollum v. BanksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Parker v. ShecutCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Dicks & Gillam, Inc. v. ClelandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Harris v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API