Legal Opinion

Brown v. Tinneny

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1980No. 440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This appeal arises from an order dismissing appellants’ motion for a new trial in a negligence case.

On October 14, 1976, Molly Brown, age 13, was walking home from school. Behind her were several boys, including John Tinneny and Timothy Labos, who were also walking home from school. (Tinneny and Labos were both 16 years old.) The boys were horseplaying and tossing stones at each other. When one of the stones struck Molly, she increased her pace and crossed the street. The boys, however, also crossed the street. About this time Tinneny saw near the curb a small glass vial,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dudley v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. PhillipsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Caldwell Et Ux. v. Com. of Pa.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Agresta v. GillespieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Lynn v. CepurneekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API