Legal Opinion

Hertz System, Inc. v. McILLREE

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 1, 1960No. Gen. 47,866Published

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE KILEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit against an Australian citizen for specific performance of a written agreement. Defendant’s motions to strike and dismiss were overruled, and after defendant failed to answer the complaint, the chancellor entered a decree for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed.

Defendant operates a car rental business in Australia. He has registered, in his own name or in the name of his nominees, the name “Hertz”, “Hertz Rent A Car”, “Hertz Driveyourself”, or one or more other variations of the name “Hertz” under the Business Names…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Time, Inc. v. T.I.M.E. Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. T. Eaton Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API