Legal Opinion
Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. T. Eaton Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 29, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
These are motions pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for an order dismissing the amended complaint on the grounds that—(1) This Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the controversy;(2) This Court lacks jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, The T. Eaton Co., Limited;'(3) This Court lacks jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, John David Eaton; and(4) -This .Court .is., not a convenient forum for the tyial and disposition of the issues involved in.this controversy..The motions, .other than, so much as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Foster v. NeilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Aerovias Interamericanas De Panama, S.A. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1961
- Taurus International Inc. v. Titan Wheel International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Hertz System, Inc. v. McILLREEAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960